Poland and Ukraine are feuding over weapons and grain. How did we get here, and what does it mean for the war? | CNN (2024)

London CNN

It appeared to be a reversal that threatened major implications for the war. On Wednesday, the prime minister of Poland, one of Kyiv’s closest and most vocal allies, said it would “no longer transfer weapons to Ukraine.”

Yet this apparently bullish move, announced amid a bitter spat with Ukraine over grain, has now evolved into a much murkier situation.

Polish President Andrzej Duda on Thursday moved to walk back his prime minister’s comments, saying they were “interpreted in the worst possible way.”

Both Duda and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have attempted to thaw the angry spat. But animosity remains after months of tensions over a temporary ban on Ukrainian grain imports to a number of European Union countries.

It also follows a pattern of increasingly confrontational behavior towards Kyiv from Poland’s government, just weeks before a tight general election.

Here’s what you need to know.

What has Poland announced?

“We no longer transfer weapons to Ukraine because we are now arming Poland,” Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said in a blunt social media statement on Wednesday that accelerated the confrontation between the allies.

Morawiecki added in a television interview that Poland would now focus on supplying “the most modern weapons” for its own purposes, state news agency PAP reported. “If you want to defend yourself you have to have something to defend with,” the prime minister said. The government meanwhile clarified he was referring to future weapons shipments, and those already agreed upon would still be completed.

Nonetheless, it seemed to indicate a major change in policy: Poland has been one of the most forthright countries in the race to get weapons and resources into Ukrainian hands. Now, Warsaw was apparently drawing a line in the sand on future donations – a potential blow for Kyiv in the event of a long, drawn-out war.

But on Thursday, Duda sought to clarify Morawiecki’s statement, saying it merely referred to new weapons being purchased for the Polish army, and that older weapons systems Warsaw deems not necessary for modernizing its own military could still be shipped across the border.

“The prime minister talked about these weapons in the context of the new weapons we are buying for our army,” Duda told Polish channel TVN24. “That was the statement. In my opinion, the prime minister said: ‘We will not transfer to Ukraine new weapons that we are currently purchasing as part of the modernization of our army.’

Duda added, “please remember that we have contracts signed with Ukraine, for example for the supply of Krabs (howitzers).” Poland still needs to fulfill that agreement, as well as other contracts, including for ammunition and mine-clearing vehicles, which “are needed for the counteroffensive,” Duda said.

“As we receive new weapons from (South) Korea and the United States, we will loosen the weapons we have in stock today. Perhaps we will transfer weapons that will be removed from the Polish army to Ukraine, just as we have done so far when we transferred post-Soviet weapons,” Duda said.

There has meanwhile never been any suggestion that Poland – the key conduit country for almost all weapons transfers into Ukraine – would stop allowing other Western weapons to pass through its borders on the way to the frontlines.

And both countries have quickly moved to dissipate anger. Kyiv’s minister of agrarian policy said he had spoken with his Polish counterpart and issued a statement saying the pair “discussed the situation and Ukraine’s proposal to resolve it, and agreed to find a solution that takes into account the interests of both countries.”

But Duda’s comments left it unclear what the true effect of Warsaw’s pronouncements might be, or whether any weapons intended for Ukraine would be impacted.

Poland and Ukraine are feuding over weapons and grain. How did we get here, and what does it mean for the war? | CNN (1)

Video Ad Feedback

Polish president on what Ukraine must do as Putin's war rages

02:10 - Source: CNN

How did we get here?

Pressure has been building for months over a ban on Ukrainian grain, initially put in place earlier this year by several EU nations to protect the livelihood of local farmers worried about being undercut by the low price of Ukrainian grain.

Last week, the EU announced plans to suspend the rule. But three nations – Poland, Hungary and Slovakia – said they intended to defy the change and keep the restrictions in place. It prompted protests from Ukraine, which this week filed lawsuits against all three countries over the issue.

Ukraine, often called the “breadbasket of Europe” due to the vast quantities of grain it produces, had its Black Sea ports blockaded by Russia following its full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Fearing that the situation was “threatening global food security,” the European Commission set up what it called “solidarity lanes” in May to facilitate exports, and temporarily eliminated all duties and quotas on Ukraine’s exports, allowing a glut of cheap Ukrainian grain to flow into the continent.

Poland and Ukraine are feuding over weapons and grain. How did we get here, and what does it mean for the war? | CNN (2)

Combines harvest wheat in a field in the Zaporizhzhia region of Russian-controlled Ukraine.

Anger in Poland has been simmering since the spring, when farmers led demonstrations against the moves. But they erupted once again in recent days, after the decision of the three nations to ignore the removal of the ban.

In a swipe against the trio on Wednesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told the UN General Assembly in New York that “it is alarming to see how some in Europe, some of our friends in Europe, play out solidarity in a political theater – making a thriller from the grain.”

Zelensky added that the nations involved “may seem to play their own role but in fact they are helping set the stage to a Moscow actor.” His comments sparked immediate condemnation from Poland, with the foreign ministry summoning the Ukrainian ambassador to convey its “strong protest.”

Those comments intensified anger in Warsaw, resulting just hours later in Morawiecki’s statement on weapons shipments.

When asked whether he was upset after Zelensky’s words, Duda told TVN24 “maybe upset is a too strong word.”

“I was embittered, I would rather put it that way. I say this: let’s stay calm, please do not raise the temperature, because this is a dispute that concerns a small part of our relations. Let’s not allow it to affect the whole, because there is no justification for it and only others will benefit from it,” Duda said.

A tight election looms

Poland’s initial response to the war on Ukraine earned its populist government a rare swelling of goodwill from across Europe, and made it a major player in the Western response to Russia’s aggression.

The country has taken in more than 1.5 million Ukrainian refugees and allowed 15 million to cross its borders to flee the conflict. The two countries shared a decades-old suspicion of Moscow and Warsaw had warned for years of the pitfalls of buying Russian energy, which melded their relationship in the initial phases of the war.

But tensions have frayed in recent months, exacerbated by a pivotal election.

Poland’s populist ruling party, Law and Justice (PiS), are preparing for a vote on October 15 which opinion polls suggest could result in them losing their parliamentary majority. They are particularly suffering in their stronghold rural regions in eastern Poland, where agriculture is an important economic pillar.

Poland and Ukraine are feuding over weapons and grain. How did we get here, and what does it mean for the war? | CNN (3)

Poland's Prime Minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, faces a tight election next month.

PiS is losing a chunk of its typical voter base to the Confederation party, a historically far-right group that has been rallying against the costs of Warsaw’s military aid to Kyiv and complained that Ukraine’s plight has become a greater priority for the government than that of Polish people.

In response, PiS has seemingly toned down its support for Kyiv in recent months and shown willingness to take on a more combative stance. In August, Warsaw summoned the Ukrainian ambassador to Poland after a Polish foreign policy adviser accused Kyiv of being ungrateful for Poland’s support in exporting its grain.

Poland’s opposition parties were quick to pounce on this week’s uncertainty over weapons shipments.

Radek Sikorski, a Member of the European Parliament and previously Poland’s defense and foreign minister, told CNN that “incompetence is at play” regarding the latest spat.

“The government failed in organizing transit corridors for Ukrainian grain to Africa and China,” Sikorski said, adding that “if Poland had a better relationship with Brussels, it could’ve all been done a year ago.”

What does this mean for the war?

While Warsaw’s position on weapons remains unclear, any reversal in Polish military and strategic support for Ukraine would have major consequences. Poland has been among the most eager nations to bolster Kyiv’s arsenal since the initial days of the full-scale war, and has shown a willingness to push other European powers and the US into joining them.

In January, when Germany agonized over whether to provide Leopard 2 battle tanks to Kyiv’s troops, Poland took a leading role in bringing together a European coalition that gave Berlin enough leeway to make the move.

Oliver Weiken/picture alliance/Getty Images Ukraine's counteroffensive may be painful. But its success is crucial to wider European security

For days, Polish officials talked up publicly and privately their desire to get the high-tech combat vehicles onto the front lines, and insisted they would do so whether or not fellow nations came with them.

Kyiv and its allies will have concerns that if Warsaw takes a new attitude to future arms shipments, other hesitant European countries will feel less pressure to also donate supplies. So, even if this dispute is resolved and shipments continue to Kyiv as before, the episode has brought lessons to both countries.

Poland would be hesitant to anger NATO and the United States – its two crucial security partners – by reducing the flow of weapons onto the front lines. But its domestic political context has pressed PiS into taking a firmer line on Kyiv, and a close or ambiguous electoral result next month may lengthen the tightrope the party is walking.

But Zelensky’s tough words for Poland this week have also highlighted the risks of pushing his allies’ buttons too forcefully. His UNGA speech clearly angered many in Warsaw, and the longer the grain dispute continues, the more likely spats between Kyiv and its nearest ally will become.

CNN’s Antonia Mortensen, Sharon Braithwaite, Radina Gigova, Mitchell McCluskey, Mariya Knight, Olga Voitovych and Tim Lister contributed reporting

Introduction

I am an expert and enthusiast. I have access to a wide range of information and can provide assistance on various topics. I can help answer your questions and provide insights based on available information. Let's dive into the concepts mentioned in the article you provided.

Poland's Announcement and Clarification

Poland's Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki announced that Poland would "no longer transfer weapons to Ukraine" and would focus on arming Poland instead [[1]]. This statement seemed to indicate a major change in policy, as Poland has been actively supporting Ukraine in the race to acquire weapons and resources. However, Polish President Andrzej Duda later clarified that the statement referred to new weapons being purchased for the Polish army, and older weapons systems deemed unnecessary for modernizing Poland's military could still be shipped to Ukraine [[1]].

Duda emphasized that Poland has contracts signed with Ukraine for the supply of weapons like Krabs (howitzers) and other equipment needed for the counteroffensive [[1]]. He mentioned that as Poland receives new weapons from South Korea and the United States, they may transfer weapons that will be removed from the Polish army to Ukraine, similar to what they have done in the past with post-Soviet weapons [[1]].

Background: Ban on Ukrainian Grain and Tensions

The article mentions that tensions between Poland and Ukraine have been building for months over a ban on Ukrainian grain imposed by several EU nations to protect the livelihood of local farmers concerned about being undercut by the low price of Ukrainian grain [[2]]. Last week, the EU announced plans to suspend the ban, but Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia stated their intention to defy the change and keep the restrictions in place [[2]].

This decision prompted protests from Ukraine, which filed lawsuits against all three countries over the issue [[2]]. The ban on Ukrainian grain exports was a significant concern for Ukraine, often referred to as the "breadbasket of Europe" due to its large grain production [[2]]. The situation was further complicated by Russia's blockade of Ukraine's Black Sea ports following its invasion in February 2022 [[2]].

Political Context: Polish General Election

The article highlights that Poland's ruling party, Law and Justice (PiS), is preparing for a tight general election on October 15, and opinion polls suggest they could lose their parliamentary majority [[3]]. PiS has faced criticism from the Confederation party, a historically far-right group, which has rallied against the costs of Warsaw's military aid to Ukraine and claimed that Ukraine's plight has become a greater priority for the government than that of Polish people [[3]].

In response to the electoral pressure, PiS has seemingly toned down its support for Ukraine in recent months and shown a willingness to take a more combative stance [[3]]. The article mentions that Poland's opposition parties have seized on the uncertainty surrounding weapons shipments as an opportunity to criticize the government [[3]].

Implications for the War

The true effect of Poland's pronouncements on weapons shipments remains unclear [[1]]. However, any reversal in Polish military and strategic support for Ukraine would have significant consequences. Poland has been one of the most eager nations to bolster Ukraine's arsenal and has played a leading role in rallying other European powers and the US to provide support [[4]].

If Poland takes a new attitude towards future arms shipments, it may reduce the pressure on other hesitant European countries to donate supplies to Ukraine [[4]]. While Poland would be hesitant to anger NATO and the United States, its two crucial security partners, reducing the flow of weapons onto the front lines could be influenced by the domestic political context and the upcoming election [[4]].

On the other hand, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's tough words for Poland have also highlighted the risks of pushing his allies' buttons too forcefully [[4]]. The longer the grain dispute continues, the more likely tensions between Ukraine and its nearest ally, Poland, may escalate [[4]].

Conclusion

In summary, Poland's announcement regarding the transfer of weapons to Ukraine caused initial concern, but Polish President Andrzej Duda clarified that it referred to new weapons being purchased for the Polish army and not to previously agreed-upon shipments [[1]]. The tensions between Poland and Ukraine stem from a ban on Ukrainian grain imposed by several EU nations, which Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia have chosen to defy [[2]]. The upcoming Polish general election adds a political context to the situation, with Poland's ruling party facing electoral pressure and criticism from opposition parties [[3]]. The implications for the war in Ukraine remain uncertain, but any reduction in Polish support could have significant consequences for Ukraine's arsenal and the broader European response [[4]].

Poland and Ukraine are feuding over weapons and grain. How did we get here, and what does it mean for the war? | CNN (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 5665

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Birthday: 2001-07-17

Address: Suite 794 53887 Geri Spring, West Cristentown, KY 54855

Phone: +5934435460663

Job: Central Hospitality Director

Hobby: Yoga, Electronics, Rafting, Lockpicking, Inline skating, Puzzles, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Clemencia Bogisich Ret, I am a super, outstanding, graceful, friendly, vast, comfortable, agreeable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.